In an interview with BBC, General Petraeus, the outgoing commander of US troops in Iraq, states that he probably will not ever use the word ‘victory’ in discussions about Iraq. Further (and this is what I like about our military leaders), he argues that honesty is the best policy when it comes to reports about the security situation in Iraq. Petraeus will go on to lead US Central Command, which includes overseeing troops in Afghanistan. He describes the need for readjustment in terms of US strategy with both countries, and also states that security in Iraq is much more ‘durable’ than it was, however still has a long way to go. The new Iraq commander, General Odierno, also feels this way, addressing the insecure situation in one of his first speeches as Commander. (To see the BBC interview and article on Petraeus, click the picture).

Also in the news recently, President Bush will redeploy 8,000 US troops from Iraq, sending an additional 4,500 to Afghanistan. Some argue that this may be his last major policy initiative concerning troops in the region. Senator Obama criticized Bush's move as ‘not addressing the urgency’ of the situation in Afghanistan.

Finally, I’ll leave you with some statistics concerning violence in Iraq published by BBC. The bar graph toward the top shows Iraqi death tolls listed by source. They state that the three discrepancies result from different definitions of death caused by war. The largest number, published by Lancet, is said to include deaths blamed on other causes beside violence, such as the collapse of the Iraqi infrastructure. The pie chart shows military deaths by country, demonstrating that US troops have given many more lives than all other coalition countries combined. The article also discusses the refugee crisis, civilian death tolls by region and US and UK fatalities.
2 Comments So Far»
Hutchinsons Almanac 1999 can anyone verify the information on page 15,
that the time zones for Baghdad Iraq and Buenos Aires Argentina have
been swapped around.Baghdad shows time as 21:00 and Buenos Aires shows
time as 14:00
foursgiant@msn.com
The nonsense in the Lancet study can NOT be brushed away that easily. It was yet another politically motivated piece that gave comfort to the insurgency.
It is really not difficult to see. Car bombs are big, loud and messy. You can’t miss them. Iraqibodycount, amongst others, had a big list of all the car bombs during the war. Yet according to Lancet, in a one year period, over 160 people we dying daily to these bombs. This number is easily refuted because car bombs mortality rates are rather accurate. The figure is about 10 times too high, which interesting turns out to be about about the factor by which these people got it wrong by.
One would think a group of qualified professionals would easily be able to do such simple cross checking. In fact I’m sure they could. However, that was not the purpose of the ’study’.
Leave Comments Below»